Comments on: 5 Wildly Inaccurate Interpretations of Art

By: I-Dont-Kno-Anything-Bout-Art-Bitch!!!

I-Dont-Kno-Anything-Bout-Art-Bitch!!! — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:59:40 +0000

Who painted Mona Lisa??? Her smile looks crippled, she looks ugly, she looks like a man with long hair and she ain’t got boobs!!! Was Leonardo da Vinci sure Mona Lisa is not a man? Or was he a homo that wanted to draw his lover but afraid of being humiliated and drew his head with a kind-od-woman body???

By: andiamó

andiamó — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:13:06 +0000

hahaha i laughed so hard at
"We here at Funny Crave don’t know shit about art. "
and
"the first being sculpture .. and the second being insane asylum poop-smeared wall art."

By: LuisPrada

LuisPrada — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:05:59 +0000

I have no fucking clue as to what you guys are talking about

By: LuisPrada

LuisPrada — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:05:35 +0000

I have no fucking clue what you guys are talking about

By: ReverendTed

ReverendTed — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:56:09 +0000

Well, Michelangelo's work is representative, while much of Picasso's is more strictly evocative. (That's not to say Michelangelo's art can't evoke an emotional response.)

By: Comet Arcade

Comet Arcade — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:03:05 +0000

I can never understand Picasso's work. It looks like a random shapes and colors, compared to say, Michelangelo's.