Carrie Prejean is Fed up with Larry King’s Inappropriate Behavior
By Ian ForteyCarrie Prejean is, for the most part, someone you shouldn’t know about but that the media has made you aware of because the media does things like this. Remember the balloon boy some weeks back? Same thing. Take some kind of idiotic debacle and make it national news. Only in this case, Carrie Prejean refuses to go away.
So she was Little Miss Sunshine or something and then she expressed her opinion on gay marriage and the world either gasped, shrugged or was watching a different channel and didn’t know to not give a shit one way or the other. Then she was shitcanned by the pageant people for breach of contract, even though she denies any of that happened. Then there were lawsuits. Then apparently nudie pics and a sex tape, which is a whole different brand of funny for someone who keeps cramming it down everyone’s throat that she’s a good Christian and has all these values, most of which seem to fall under the umbrella of hypocrisy but that’s not what we’re making fun of today. We make fun of all kinds of stuff and maybe another day we’ll make fun of that. But today, it’s all about Larry King.
Larry King, as you may be aware, is CNN’s crypt keeper. He actually lived in a barrow on the site where they built the CNN studio since sometime before white men settled the area and just haunted the building until they hired him. If you’re so inclined you can peruse his extensive library of interviews and be astounded by the way in which he is the worst interviewer in the history of ever, unless there’s someone out there who routinely calls their guests cockbags and/or smacks them in lieu of asking questions.
It’s not that Larry is evil like most of the people at FOX or anything, and he’s not inflammatory, it’s just that he never seems to actually do research or, in most cases, give a fig who he’s talking to. It’s amazing. It’s like he’s never heard of most of his guests before.
That aside, this chunk of Larry’s journalistic career isn’t even so bad. He asks Prejean a pretty reasonable question which she refuses to answer. Confused, he asks for clarification and Prejean bunches her panties and freaks out in that self-important pretty girl way you’ve likely seen many others do and decides she’s going to do things her way, even if she’s too fucking stupid to know what that means.
In a nutshell, Larry wanted to know why she settled her court case. Not the terms, just what made her change her mind. Prejean is either not smart enough o know that her motives are not covered by a confidential agreement or she just didn’t want to talk about it and couldn’t think to say that.
You’ll notice as she’s getting mic’d at the end they cut to commercial. But the cameras were still rolling! Here’s what transpired!
Larry King: Carrie, can you hear me?
Carrie Prejean: Yes, Larry.
LK: Are we OK now? You’re staying to take some calls?
CP: Yes, we can take some calls.
LK Can I ask you if you wax your hole? The backdoor hole? I hear models do that.
CP: No, Larry. That line of questioning is inappropriate.
LK: Very well. Can I ask if you’ve ever tongue kissed Bon Eubanks?
CP: No, Larry. That line of questioning is inappropriate.
LK: Noted. What if a caller wants to know if you pee standing up?
CP: No, Larry. That line of questioning is inappropriate.
LK: Understood. Do you poo standing up? Bowel movements. BM. Feces.
CP: No, Larry. That line of questioning is inappropriate.
LK: Have you, Carrie Prejean, ever farted in a space suit?
CP: No, Larry. That line of questioning is inappropriate.
LK: Wet suit?
CP: No, Larry. That line of questioning is inappropriate.
LK: Leisure suit?
CP: No, Larry. That line of questioning is inappropriate.
LK: Very well. And we’re back! Paul from San Diego, you have a question.
Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:37PM
Carrie is like luggage, herpes and dogshit on your athletic shoes, she never goes away. Of course given that Larry King, every since being found guility of passing bad checks in 1971 in Florida, has made a living pandering to these types of bimbos.
What can one really expect
Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:42PM
The author of this article is so ignorant and partisan. On what basis does he feel it appropriate to call the commentators on another network evil ("It’s not that Larry is evil like most of the people at FOX or anything…")? Just because their commentators have a different political point of view? Comments like this are so much more telling on the commenter than on the target of the comment.
Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:22PM
What do you mean "another" network? I don't work at a network. I just mean FOX is evil. It's not like CNN isn't evil. It isn't, but I never said that, though I guess if they have the crypt keeper working for them they're not all smiles and sunshine and frankly I think both Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper have issues but that's neither here nor there.
And yes, it's because of the political point of view expressed on FOX news that I call them evil – a point of view that isn't conservative, but intolerant and ultra conservative. They're assholes, if you prefer that term instead of evil, but the fact is they don't report news, they report biased agenda pieces that skew facts in a much more blatant way than any media outlet since the golden age of newspaper story fabrication during the world wars. If you watch FOX news that's great, it's often hilarious. If you believe FOX news though then I think we need to refresh ourselves on the definition of "ignorant."